Re: Calendar vs. Timestamp
От | Wei Wei |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Calendar vs. Timestamp |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060411225918.2918986B12@ws7-1.us4.outblaze.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Calendar vs. Timestamp ("Wei Wei" <wei725@lycos.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Calendar vs. Timestamp
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
> > Is 8.1 driver compatible with PG 8.0? I can easily update the PG > > version on my development box. But, it wouldn't easy for the > > deployment box. > > > > Yes, the 8.1 driver is backward compatible with all server releases > back to 7.2. As always it's good to test on your development box > first, but I don't see any problems with an upgrade. > After having a 8.1 driver, the timestamp is stored correctly in the DB. So, it indeed is a bug in the 8.0 driver. I would like to clarify one observation. The timestamp seems only take the date section data of a calendar object regardlessthe value of the time zone. If so, a calendar object with a specified time zone would not make any difference incomparsion to a calendar object with the default time zone. Or, the default time zone is always used in PG. Thanks. -- _______________________________________________ Search for businesses by name, location, or phone number. -Lycos Yellow Pages http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: