Re: PGSTAT: bind(2): Can't assign requested address
От | Bjoern A. Zeeb |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGSTAT: bind(2): Can't assign requested address |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060405162701.W76259@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGSTAT: bind(2): Can't assign requested address (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> writes: >> A datagram socket (SOCK_DGRAM) is called "UDP Socket" when it >> assumes IP (AF_INET) or IPv6 (AF_INET6) as it's underlying >> protocol. >> But you can always use SOCK_DGRAM over AF_LOCAL. > > I'm unconvinced that that has the same semantics on all platforms. > Unix pipes traditionally have different behavior with respect to > blocking, partial message send, etc. Are you worried about posix local sockets in general? Or are you worried about doing sock_dgram over posix local sockets? just some more thoughts... - libpq uses posix local sockets (even streaming) as default if available and no hostname is given. I'd be more worried about my data... - posix local sockets have been around for ages and I'd rather rely on posix local sockets than any IPv6 protocol implementation. - it's the same API on top of them - it's posix these days - it could be configurable/optional -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: