Re: semaphore usage "port based"?
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: semaphore usage "port based"? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060402225215.I947@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: semaphore usage "port based"? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Sent offlist ... On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: >> On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote: >>> OK, could we see strace (or whatever BSD calls it) output for the second >>> postmaster? I'd like to see exactly what results it's getting for the >>> kernel calls it makes during IpcSemaphoreCreate. > >> 'k, dont' know what strace is ... we have ktrace and truss ... truss is >> what I usually use, and is: > > truss seems to have an output format closer to what I'm used to, but > either will do. > > regards, tom lane > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: