Re: pg_class catalog question...
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_class catalog question... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060331154118.GB12579@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_class catalog question... ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_class catalog question...
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On 3/31/06, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu> wrote: > > What if you put your char[64] before relhassubclass, then you > > don't change CLASS_TUPLE_SIZE. > > Thought about that... but it would be an ugly place for this column. > I know I could get around it by renumbering the attribute, but that's > just a kludge. What are you using a char[64] for anyway? You should probably consider using NameData, if you want to store an identifier. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: