Re: Index scan startup time
От | Michael Stone |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index scan startup time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060330124251.GK6811@mathom.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index scan startup time ("Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index scan startup time
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 02:31:34PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: >Well, it's logical enough; it scans along activity_id until it finds one with >state=10000 or state=10001. You obviously have a _lot_ of records with low >activity_id and state none of these two, so Postgres needs to scan all those >records before it founds 100 it can output. This is the “startup cost” you're >seeing. Yes. And the estimates are bad enough (orders of magnitude) that I can't help but wonder whether pg could come up with a better plan with better statistics: >>>> -> Index Scan using activity_pk on activity (cost=0.00..40717259.91 rows=6538650 width=8) (actual time=207356.050..207356.722rows=100 loops=1) Filter: ((state = 10000) OR (state = 10001)) Mike Stone
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: