Re: Problem using set-returning functions
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem using set-returning functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060327070103.U96317@megazone.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problem using set-returning functions (Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Problem using set-returning functions
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Markus Schaber wrote: > Hi, John, > > John DeSoi wrote: > > > With SRFs, you need to specify what you want to select. In other words > > if you are calling generate_x(bar) you need "select * from > > generate_x(bar)" -- "select generate_x(bar)" will not work. > > So, then, why does it work with generate_series() and dump()? It's an implementation detail. Some languages handle SRFs in a way that can be handled in the select list (SQL and C I think) and others do not (plpgsql). The latter will likely change at some point, although there are some confusing issues with SRFs in the select list as well, see the difference in behavior between: select generate_series(1,10), generate_series(1,5);vs select * from generate_series(1,10) g1, generate_series(1,5) g2;
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: