Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060309013825.B1178@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > [ There is text before PGP section. ] >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >>> Right. It is a case where the volume of patches just overwhelms us and >>> we give them commit access. It isn't "trust", and the only downside I >>> see to commit vs. non-commit users is the delay in getting things into >>> CVS. The delay used to be 24-48 hours, but as my responsibilities have >>> grown, the delay has grown as well. I am not sure how to fix that. >> >> Delegate that responsibility to the others that have commit access. If >> that's not enough, grant some more people commit access so they can >> apply the already approved patches. And stop traveling all over the >> world so much. :) > > The patch queues are open and committers are encourages to apply them. > Neil and Tom do it sometimes. I then remove the item and update any > TODO entries. Is it as simple as "if nobody objects within 24 hours, apply"? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: