Re: CREATE SYNONYM ...
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CREATE SYNONYM ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060307134229.M47286@megazone.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CREATE SYNONYM ... ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CREATE SYNONYM ...
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 12:39:55PM -0800, Stephan Szabo wrote: > > > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Jonah H. Harris wrote: > > > > > On 3/7/06, Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd personally be more interested in what the impact is on people not > > > > using synonyms. How free is any search for synonyms if you aren't using > > > > the feature? > > > > > > > > > Unless synonym enablement were a configurable parameter (which wouldn't > > > really make sense), the cost would be the same whether they're used or not > > > during searching. > > > > Right, but the response was that "using" synonyms incurred a cost and this > > should be documented. However, if there's a cost to people not using > > synonyms there's a higher barrier to entry for the feature. > > Wouldn't the cost only be incurred if you searched for something in > pg_class that wasn't there, and therefor had to fall back to pg_synonym? I think if synonyms were search path dependant that wouldn't be true since you'd need to know if there was a synonym that shadowed another item.
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: