Re: ALTER CONSTRAINT RENAME patch reverted

Where are we on this patch.  It was reverted.  I someone going to clean
it up so we can apply it?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> This patch appears seriously broken, in particular every routine I
> > >> looked at contained incorrect locking assumptions.  Nor do I care
> > >> for using pg_depend for the purposes it's being used for here.
> >
> > > OK, how do we proceed?  Revert or apply a second patch?
> >
> > I'd say revert; the patch is going to need significant rework.
>
> OK, patch reverted.  Updated version attached.  Please adjust and
> resubmit.  Thanks.
>

--
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  SRA OSS, Inc.   http://www.sraoss.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +