Re: fsync and battery-backed caches
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fsync and battery-backed caches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200602280106.k1S16DK16068@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fsync and battery-backed caches ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: fsync and battery-backed caches
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:12:57AM +0100, Tino Wildenhain wrote: > > Javier Somoza schrieb: > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > Is it secure to disable fsync havin battery-backed disk cache? > > > > > > Thx > > > > > No. fsync moves the data from OS memory cache to disk-adaptor > > cache which is required to benefit from battery backup. > > More importantly, in guarantees that data is committed to non-volatile > storage in such a way that PostgreSQL can recover from a crash without > corruption. > > If you have a battery-backed controller and turn on write caching you > shouldn't see much effect from fsync anyway. We do mention battery-backed cache in our docs: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/wal.html If it is unclear, please let us know. -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: