Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:24:05AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> >How fine-grained do we want to get on namespaces? I'd be slightly more 
> >inclined to have pg_info or maybe pg_utils as a place to stash not only 
> >extra system views but other utility stuff that we want to ship but is 
> >essentially droppable.
> 
> AFAIK, none of the contributors to newsysviews has any attachment to any 
> particular name.  I'd personally prefer to go with your suggestion of a 
> more generic schema name.

Agreed. pg_info or pg_util sound good. Since there's a fairly large
number of views I don't know if it's worth having both pg_info and
pg_util.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461