Re:
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060227203834.A1005@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re:
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:57:27PM +0000, Guido Barosio wrote: >> Were do we finde accurate values, more updated ones? >> Guess we should measure current values and compare them later, in a few >> months after oracle dbms war gets quiet. >> >> http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3462241 > > "In our survey, 90 percent of our developers work with or deployed to > Windows platforms," McKendrick explained. "Windows dominates this space, > and a database that doesn't run on Windows or doesn't run effectively in > Windows would have a fairly limited reach." > > Does that strike anyone else as being *highly* skewed? Aren't most surveys, stats and benchmarks? :( there is no such thing as an "unbiased result" in statistics, it will always be skewed in some way based on the person generating the stats ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: