Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf .... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200602271659.45451.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf .... ("Mark Woodward" <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mark, > My frustration level often kills any desire to contribute to open > source. Sometimes, I think that open source is doomed. The various > projects I track and use are very frustrating, they remind me of > dysfunctional engineering departments in huge companies, it is very hard > to positively discuss any new ideas. The first response is always some > variation on "no." Well, if you weren't a regular I'd be more encouraging. But you already know how things work here, so we can give you a hard time. I'll point out the year-long argument over the newsysviews for the contributors, the two-year long process for 2PC, etc. Sometimes you can just throw stuff up on this forum and people will say "wow, cool, I could really use something that does that." and you're off and flying. Other times, though, it's hard for people on this list to see how a vague proposal would be useful, so you need to have a prototype that *shows* how useful it is. As a parallel, I personally didn't see the utility of DTrace until I saw Brian Cantrell give a demo of the full feature set. If you just read the spec, it's hard to see how it's an improvement over oprofile. > Maybe it is that the whiteboard engineering discussion process doesn't > translate well to this medium. Nope. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: