Re: Domains and supporting functions
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Domains and supporting functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060219223421.GJ1323@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Domains and supporting functions (elein <elein@varlena.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Domains and supporting functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:36:41PM -0800, elein wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:29:35PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 12:59:35PM -0800, elein wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 07:57:42PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > > > ORDER BY x ASC is a synonym for ORDER BY x USING >. That's the way it > > > > is currently. To use ORDER BY by itself you need to call your operators > > > > < and >. > > > > > > > > > > This does not work where x is datatype foo with opclass foo_ops. > > > In this case, it uses the text > instead of the foo >. > > > > Huh? You must be doing something unusual because it does work normally. > > Did you specify the opclass as the default for the type? > > > > I'll show you my test case if you'll show me yours :) Ok, here's a quick example I whipped up and if you run it it clearly shows it's using the comparison function from the operator class. http://svana.org/kleptog/temp/text2.example It basically replicates the entire infrastructure for the text type as a new type, "text2" so there's planty of scope for confusion, but postgresql correctly picks the right function. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: