Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060219.162859.21930016.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> writes: > > I suggest that PQescapeString() should have a parameter to specify the > > encoding of "to". > > You mean the encoding of "from", no? Oops, "from", yes. > But actually I'd argue that > letting the client programmer supply the encoding is still a pretty > dangerous practice. Your example demonstrates that if the encoding > PQescapeString is told is different from the encoding the backend parser > thinks is in use, problems result. Perhaps we should pass the PGconn > to new-PQescapeString and let it dig the client encoding out of that. Sound good to pass PGconn to new-PQescapeString. Here is the proposed calling sequence for the new function: size_t PQescapeStringWithConn (const PGconn *conn, char *to, const char *from, size_t length) If this is ok, I will implement for 8.2. > You could still get burnt if the client encoding changes between the > invocation of new-PQescapeString and the sending of the constructed > command, but that's a fairly unlikely case. > > The bottom line to this though is that these encodings are just plain > dangerous. I'm more than half tempted to suggest that the only secure > answer is to drop support for these encodings. Consider for example > an application that isn't using PQescapeString but has its own > double-backslashes-and-quotes logic embedded. You can break it if you > can manage to get the backend to think that the client encoding is SJIS > or similar. That's a hazard we're basically not ever going to be able > to prevent. Dropping support for SJIS and so on will not be practical at all since these encodings has been widely used and I don't see these encodings are deprecated in the near future. I think dropping the support will simply prevent people from using PostgreSQL. Especially in Windows world, these encodings are pretty common. I know that these encodings are broken in their design and actually I hate them:-) But this is real world and we have to live with them... -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: