On Friday 17 February 2006 08:50, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> I believe there was some concern by some of the graphics donors about
> >> re-using the graphics in commercial products. I guess I would just
> >> wonder if we should refuse graphics that are not BSD licensed? If we
> >> make clear as to which license applies to which graphics, I think we
> >> should be open to accepting more than just BSD.
> >
> > In the essence of keeping things simple. They should just be BSD
> > licensed. We are not in the business of keeping track of IP rights.
>
> In order to keept things simple, I agree to supply my source picture
> under plain BSD, but frankly I would like it a little more restricted if
> possible. I took the picture and reworked it specifically for PostgreSQL
> and related use, any usage in pgsql banners etc is welcome without
> further notice. If it was used exceeding pgsql, I'd like to be mentioned
> as originator. I wonder if there's a template license for this
> applicable for all graphics, I wouldn't be surprised if other pic
> contributors felt the same as me.
Check with Jan, RE the slony logo, he has much the same terms on it.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
--
Darcy Buskermolen
Wavefire Technologies Corp.
http://www.wavefire.com
ph: 250.717.0200
fx: 250.763.1759