Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060214184532.GD4474@ns.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe" ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe" |
Список | pgsql-general |
* Marc G. Fournier (scrappy@postgresql.org) wrote: > As of this moment, if Oracle buys Zend, they could effectively kill PHP > ... the core engine that PHP is built around is a Zend engine, so if they > were to revoke the license for that, PHP would be dead ... kinda like > MySQL with InnoDB ... now, there was talk at one point time with > replacying that engine with Parrot, so I'm not sure how hard/long it would > take for them to do so if Zend got pulled out from under them ... Has there been any actual test (ie: court case) of a piece of software being released under an open source (BSD, GPL, whatever) license and then the licensor revoking that and stopping everyone from distributing the code? Personally, I have no idea at all if this is something which can be done and upheld or not and I'm kind of curious about it. That would be a very different (and much more difficult for the rest of us) situation from releasing future versions as closed-source only or just not releasing new versions. Thanks, Stephen
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: