Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060203093241.U59873@megazone.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table ("Patrick Rotsaert" <patrick.rotsaert@arrowup.be>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table
Re: BUG #2225: Backend crash -- BIG table |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Patrick Rotsaert wrote: > > >One question is what does the explain (without analyze) plan look like for > >the above and are the row estimates valid in the case of one of the hash > >plans. > > > > > pointspp=# explain select trid, count(*) from pptran group by trid > having count(*) > 1; > QUERY PLAN > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > HashAggregate (cost=1311899.28..1311902.78 rows=200 width=18) > Filter: (count(*) > 1) > -> Seq Scan on pptran (cost=0.00..1039731.02 rows=36289102 width=18) > (3 rows) Hmm, if you do an enable_hashagg=false and then run the query (without explain) does it work then? > >Failing that, how many rows should the above return? > > > > > That is exactly what I am trying to find out. I can only guess that, but > it should not be more than a couple of 10k rows. Okay, so it's unlikely to be a client side memory issue (if it were returning alot of rows, that could also be an issue).
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: