Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb
| От | Jim C. Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060126230008.GT3920@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb
Re: Adding a --quiet option to initdb |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:36:15AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > James William Pye wrote: > > Why should initdb give it [processing > > information] to the user if the user didn't request it in the first > > place? > > Because it shows important information that we want the user to see. Plus it can be a fairly long-running process on slower machines, so providing feedback to the user is good. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: