Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" list
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060117234629.GL17896@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" list (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:50:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Cleaned out ... egad, what a lot of spam :-( > > > Almost 3 years worth ... not bad, actually ... 500 per year, less then 2 > > per day ... :) > > Yeah ... the truly depressing thought is what an un-filtered mailbox > must look like these days :-( For Nov. '05, 6645 emails scored at 5 or higher in SpamAssassin, out of 20944 total. That compares with about 2800 emails to -hackers and -general. For Dec. '05, 6723 spams out of 20186 (~2500 -hackers and -general). That's relying soley on SpamAssassin to flag spams, btw. Luckily on only gat about 10 spams a day leaking through, although I do send anything scoring >= 3 and < 5 to a 'probabably spam' folder, which helps quite a bit (I don't really consider those as 'leaking through'). > I'm about ready to engage in vigilante action against spammers, myself. Need any help moving bodies? ;) -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: