Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers"

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> > As someone else suggested, do we want to set Reply-To on that list as
> > well, to redirect discussions to -hackers?
>
> I don't think we should try to force that to happen.  A fair part of the
> followup threads in -committers aren't really very interesting and need
> not go to -hackers.  Another problem with adding Reply-To is that by
> default a copy will *not* go personally to the particular committer,
> which is something that you usually do want to happen when commenting
> on a commit.
>
> (BTW, have we yet got things fixed so that all the addresses that appear
> as "From:" for committers actually work to forward mail to the
> respective person?  Last I checked it seemed not to work for me or
> Bruce, but that was awhile ago.)

It does work for me now, and probably for you too.  :-)

All email to @postgresql.org addresses go into this email system:

    http://webmail.postgresql.org/imp/login.php

I used to have a .forward file in my shell home directory so all email
went to my pgman@candle.pha.pa.us address, but when I started getting a
lot of spam from momjian@postgresql.org, I removed the .forward file, so
I was unsure where my email was going.  When Josh Berkus wanted to use
the momjian@postgreql.org address for press contacts, I had to get it
working again.  I logged into that web account and had +99% spams.
Since Marc has added procmail spam tags, I have now re-added my .forward
file, and use the procmail tags Marc adds to help my system learn about
spam before discarding the email.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073