Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem?

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:02:07PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:52:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Does anyone see a reason to keep this layer of struct
> >> definitions?
> 
> > If you cut it out, what will the "heap" and "index" access methods
> > needed for SQL/MED use?
> 
> What's that have to do with this?

I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm mistaken, but this is a candidate
for the spot where such interfaces--think of Informix's Virtual
(Table|Index) Interface--would go.

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!