Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE?
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060111210221.GD63175@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE? (Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@cpushare.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:39:47PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > CREATE INDEX indexname ON tablename ( position(' PREEMPT ' in kernel_version) ); > > The index only helps the above query with = 0 and not the one with != 0, > but it seems not needed in practice. Hrm. If you need indexing then, you'll probably have to do 2 indexes with a WHERE clause... CREATE INDEX ... WHERE position(...) = 0; CREATE INDEX ... WHERE position(...) != 0; I suspect this is because of a lack of stats for functional indexes. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: