Re: primary key on lower(varchar)
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: primary key on lower(varchar) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060108071150.27599.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: primary key on lower(varchar) (<me@alternize.com>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
--- me@alternize.com wrote: > > I don't really see the use-case for what you want > anyway. Why don't > > you just require the field to be all lower case, > eg with a CHECK > > constraint? > > simple case: lets say the table "translated_names" > contains an foreign key, > the translated word and the language the word is in. > obviously, > "Brotaufstrich" and "brotaufstrich" must relate to > the same record. if i'm > just saving the records in lowercase (or uppercase) > i'm loosing the proper > letter case... > > the workaround of adding 2 word fields (word_lower, > word_normal) and > setting word_lower to primary key unfortunately > wastes a lot of diskspace > espially when the table grows large... > > - thomas isn't it easier to set up a serial for your primary key? __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: