Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200601061526.14436.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg, > These numbers don't make much sense to me. It seems like 5% is about as > slow as reading the whole file which is even worse than I expected. I > thought I was being a bit pessimistic to think reading 5% would be as > slow as reading 20% of the table. It's about what *I* expected. Disk seeking is the bane of many access methods. Anyway, since the proof is in the pudding, Simon and I will be working on some demo code for different sampling methods so that we can debate results rather than theory. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: