Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > The following patch allows VIEW and SEQUENCE for GRANT.  I didn't add
> > checks for relkind, figuring it wasn't worth it, right?
>
> The permissions for a sequence aren't the same as they are for a table.
> We've sort of ignored the point to date, but if we're going to add
> special syntax for granting on a sequence, I don't think we should
> continue to ignore it.

Uh, how are they different?   You mean just UPDATE and none of the
others do anything?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073