Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20060103163852.GI82560@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:29:02AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > > In general, I do prefer that permissions be seperably grantable. Being > > able to grant 'truncate' permissions would be really nice. Is the only > > reason such permission doesn't exist due to no one working on it, or is > > there other disagreement about it? > > Lack of appetite for having forty nonstandard kinds of privilege, > I suppose ;-) > > Given that we now have roles, it's fairly easy to grant "table owner" > to trusted people, so the use-case for special privilege types has > dropped off dramatically IMHO. Yeah, I hadn't thought about that. I agree; if you trust some process enough to have MVCC-affecting rights then you should be able to trust it with full ownership rights. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: