Re: Next development steps?
От | Ludek Finstrle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Next development steps? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051221133923.GE30837@soptik.pzkagis.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Next development steps? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> > I don't think release have to wait for this one. > > I do, because Tom will be needing a good release for inclusion in FC5, > otherwise it may end up being rolled back to an 07.xx release if he > thinks the problem is too risky to release (which it sounds like he > does). Ok. I didn't know this informations. But I can try it in January at first. What's the deadline? > > There are known bugs: > > - report for sqlstate (1000495) - I try to solve it now. > > + 1 waiting Solved (I hope). > > - SEGFAULT during SQLCancel (1000475) > > + 0 waiting > > - private announce about problems with Text larger than X bytes > > + 1 waiting I hope I'll solve it before the end of week. > > I don't know what all you want to give into new release. > > Not sure what you mean? It looks to me that psqlodbc-08.01.0105 with bug 1000475 solved is the most stable since libpq conversion. I don't use cleanups as I wrote before. But the most features has 07.03.255 from Hiroshi Saito. When we create new stable branch why don't create one for 07.03? > OK, I'm not worried about cleanups as long as it is as bug-free as > possible. I don't worry about bugs but about losing next steps to updateable cursor. Regards, Luf
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: