Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> I don't know about that because I am hoping to start provided .debs as
> well and
> .debs are going to be at a minimum /linux/debs/ubuntu
and /linux/debs/debian
But Debian packages are not only available on Linux. (The same is
reportedly true of RPM, but I don't know of a practical example.) I
think debian, redhat, etc. are the operating system names that parallel
"win32". "linux" should just disappear. And so should "rpms" or
"debs" unless it's part of the tree's internal organisation.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/