Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:58:33PM -0500, Robert Bernier wrote:
> Folks,
>
> It was pointed out that I struck a nerve in my last posting. There's always a polite way of voicing criticism. It
wouldhave made for a less confrontational argument if I had taken my happy pill this morning and stuck to the facts
thatI was arguing rather than ranting with strange sounds coming from my mouth about somebody I've never met.  
>
> For the record, I am quite prepared to defend my analysis of the methodology used in the the article itself.

FWIW, I never claimed the article was good. ;) I just thought it was
interesting that the author went in with a pro-Oracle bias and ended up
judging us the winner (even though at least one of his scores for
PostgreSQL was lower than deserved be a wide margin).
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461