Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas
От | Guillaume LELARGE |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200512122047.00218.guillaume.lelarge@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Something I don't understand with the use of schemas
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le Samedi 10 Décembre 2005 17:43, vous avez écrit : > Guillaume LELARGE <guillaume.lelarge@gmail.com> writes: > > Apparently, I can rename all schemas, even system schemas ! > > metier=# alter schema pg_catalog rename to foobar; > > ALTER SCHEMA > > If you are superuser, you can do anything you want, up to and including > breaking the system irretrievably. Compare "rm -rf /" on Unix. We > won't be putting training wheels on superuser status for the same > reasons that no one finds it a good idea to restrict root's abilities. > Seems pretty fair. I've made more tests on schemas. I'm able to drop information_schema and public schemas but I can't drop pg_catalog and pg_toast. It makes me think that only pg_* are system schemas and that public and information_schema are public schemas. Am I right on this one ? -- Guillaume. <!-- http://abs.traduc.org/ http://lfs.traduc.org/ http://traduc.postgresqlfr.org/ -->
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: