Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT)
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200512071950.15175.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT) ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 17:35, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Well, I can speak for Sweden. In which case it's basically that you > cannot put up *any* personally identifyable information that was not > already *explicitly made public* or that you have written permission > from the person in question, on any computer medium that can be used > outside the EU (which pretty much means the internet, it's kinda hard to > restrict it to the EU). > Well, it would pretty hard to argue that the information was not explicitly made public since the bullet points were generated from a completly autononomous 3rd party source. > Putting up pins with locations are fine, because that's not personal > information. When you put names on them, you are getting into a gray > zone. > I odn't agree, but can't argue that you're opening up to more trouble by including names. > > Anyway, to my point. If there was a big gain by doing this, it'd > *probably* be ok, but I'm not sure. But as I don't see it adding all > that much, I just don't think it's worth risking it. > > IP based locations are going to be far enough off that in most cases it > won't really be useful to know who is there. And there's going to be > loads and loads of them. But it may still be enough in *some* cases that > ppl might complain. Therefor, doing the email based list without names > makes sense. > I'd +1 this line of thinking. I don't see much argument against it. > Then having a map with manually registered people that *does* put out > names won't have as many pins on it, and the pins that are there will be > more accurate (because they are actually submitted by the person who's > there). As the information is provided by the person in question, > there's also no question of wether it's legal or not. > > Bottom line: I think we should have two maps, fulfilling the different > needs. That'll also buy us out of the possible legal gray-zone. > Well, I suspect we might actually have even more maps anyways, so it's no problem to assume this out of the gate afaics -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: