Re: fts, compond words?

> >   A & (B | (New OperatorTheNextWordMustFollow York))
>

I had thought about this before myself.  Alas I have never had the time to
properly investigate implementing such a feature.

:(

A & (B | (New + York))

Something like that?

> Actually, I love that idea.  Oleg, would it be possible to create a
> tsquery operator that understands proximity?  Or, how allowing a
> predicate to the current '&' op, as in '&[dist<=1]' meaning "next
> token follows with a max distance of  1".  I imagine that it would
> only be useful on unstripped tsvectors, but if the lexem position is
> already stored ...
>

Would the proximity go in both directions?  Or just forward? What about tokens
that come before?  Just a thought.



Andy