Re: Need help building SQL query
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Need help building SQL query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051206000413.58150.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Need help building SQL query ("Sugrue, Sean" <Sean.Sugrue@analog.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Need help building SQL query
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
> Who can I ask about large scale use of postgresql > installations in a > large company? What are the gotchas? Why > would you pay for Oracle if can use postgresql > especially if it's just > for data warehousing and not a transactional. > > Sean Sean, the largest install that i'm aware of is sesamestreet.org. i'm not exactly sure how they use it (together with php and apache), but they get 500k hits/month - so it is a busy site. again, i'm not sure if pgsql is that busy. i think most folks use oracle b/c 1. that is what they are sold. 2. the next guy is using it. 3. the PHB(pointy haird boss)es don't know enough to ask their IT departments to evaluate if PGSQL could do the job. 4. some folks believe the FUD and think that if you don't pay for it, it must not work well. there are definitely some situations where oracle makes more sense than PGSQL, but the evaluation with PGSQL should take place every time. i'd venture to guess PGSQL is never even mentioned as an alternative in 95% of oracle installs, some of which could surely be handled very well by PGSQL. the word is starting to get out, though. few business leaders want to risk their status on anything they perceive as "new," so as other implement it with success, the herd of management sheep will surely follow... but it will take time. i think Sun (or IBM???) has recently gotten involved with PGSQL... so it may get some improved marketing. __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: