Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200512031301.jB3D1Jm23880@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > In any case please be consistent about the capitalization ... > > > > OK, updated text: > > > > --with-openssl build with OpenSSL support > > --with-libedit-preferred prefer Libedit over Libreadline > > --without-readline do not use Libreadline/Libedit line editing > > --without-zlib do not use Zlib > > They are called "Readline" and "Libedit". I wanted to distinguish libreadline from readline-functionality. Why is it Readline? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: