Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200512021839.jB2Id0G29878@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > The basic problem is that with two deterministic flags the default > > values for those flags are unclear. > > That's a really good point ... the only explainable default would be > that both are --without, which is a crummy default. > > I think the way that Bruce's patch works is fine, only the name of the > switch needs tweaking ;-) Already renamed and patch posted: --with-bonjour build with Bonjour support --with-openssl build with OpenSSL support --with-libedit-preferred prefer libedit over readline --without-readline do not use Readline -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: