Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051201171211.GC31881@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > Don't worry about that, I'll take care of it. I prefer committing all > the branches at once when doing a multi-branch fix (less clutter in > the CVS logs). How do you do that? I have multiple checked-out trees, I assume you do the same and just handle the simultaneous-ness by hand? BTW, has anyone checked Command Prompt's Subversion repository? It's a mirror of our anonymous CVS (AFAICT). I'm using it for reading diffs lately, and it's much nicer to look at the whole patch as a single diff rather than going a single file at a time. http://projects.commandprompt.com/projects/public/pgsql/browser/trunk/pgsql It has the additional advantage over our current CVSweb that it's set with tabs to 4 spaces, so it looks just like our code is supposed to ... -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: