Re: Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051122204924.GF99429@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 07:50:48PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > Nice analysis, but we can't hack configure like that. It has to be able > to be fully generated from its sources. I think the other source file > you would need to look at is config/programs.m4. (Not sure about quoting > $ac_popdir - why only that one?) > > Also, I suspect we'd want to enable the libedit preference with a switch > rather than just force it, if we want to go this way. BTW, we've run into issues with readline from a licensing standpoint. It would be really nice if libedit was supported where practical (I suspect most mainstream OSes support libedit) since it's BSD licensed. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: