Re: MERGE vs REPLACE
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MERGE vs REPLACE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200511221852.jAMIqcn26518@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MERGE vs REPLACE (Jaime Casanova <systemguards@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: MERGE vs REPLACE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jaime Casanova wrote: > > > > And yes merge CAN be used to do REPLACE (oracle uses their dummy table > > for this, we can use the fact that FROM clause isn't required in postgres). > > > > the FROM clause is required by default (starting with 8.1) unless you > change a postgresql.conf parameter. > > and i don't think that idea will have any fan... No, it is not, try SELECT 1. Oracle requires SELECT 1 FROM dual. The change in 8.1 is that SELECT pg_class.relname no longer works. You have to do SELECT relname FROM pg_class. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: