Re: BUG #2051: CREATE TEMP TABLE AS SELECT doesn't play nice with ON COMMIT DROP
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #2051: CREATE TEMP TABLE AS SELECT doesn't play nice with ON COMMIT DROP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051117230234.GD9407@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #2051: CREATE TEMP TABLE AS SELECT doesn't play nice with ON COMMIT DROP (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #2051: CREATE TEMP TABLE AS SELECT doesn't play nice
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 05:32:43PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:37:14PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> CREATE TEMP TABLE foo ... ON COMMIT DROP; > > > It's that first little elipsis mark that's the problem. Is there > > something really clever I've been missing on how to do a dynamic > > table creation? > > Oh, you're worried about what to do if you don't know the output > column set of the query? OK, that is a bit harder, but I think it's > still a corner case. How much are you really going to get done with > the table if you don't know what columns it has? My use case is when I have a system of audit tables that look like this: CREATE TABLE foo ( ... ); CREATE TABLE foo_audit ( foo_audit_id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY, foo_actor TEXT, foo_timestamp TIMESTAMP, foo_action char(1) CHECK foo_action IN('D','I','U'), old_foo foo, new_foo foo ); with appropriate TRIGGERs, etc. to make that happen. It nice feature of being partitionable via constraint exclusion. This is in aid of a system for making it possible to ALTER foo while preserving the data in foo_audit. Cheers, D -- David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote!
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: