Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200511150307.jAF37nN25508@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at> writes: > > Would you mind reporting this to RedHat Bugzilla? I believe a bug report > > from you would have more weight then mine, because you actually > > understand what's going on here. :-) > > Actually, given the thought that this may be an artifact of keeping an > intermediate value in a wider-than-normal register rather than genuinely > rearranging the computation, I'm not certain it is a compiler bug. > We'd have to study it a lot more closely before filing it as one, anyway. > > If you accept the idea that the pentium4 answer is the right one, > then what we really need to do is focus on a better rounding rule than > "strict truncation". I was toying with the notion of adding the > equivalent of half a microsecond to the fractional-day value before > truncating it to integer. But I'm not certain that that wouldn't have > some bad effects in other cases. Looking at the code, do we need additional rint() calls in there, or rint(x + 0.5)? Frankly, I am confused why interval_div() has caused such problems for us? Are we going at this the right way? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: