Re: generic builtin functions
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: generic builtin functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051110171230.GF19686@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | generic builtin functions (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: generic builtin functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:02:58PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > I am looking at creating a few generic functions builtin for the enum > stuff. These would be tied to each enum type as it is created. However, > they should not really appear in pg_proc initially, as there wouldn't be > any enum types to tie them to anyway. But I want them to have reserved > oids and appear in the list of builtins. Why? What's wrong with creating the functions when people use the module, like every other module in contrib? Is there a reason you need fixed oids? Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: