Re: Is this a buggy behavior?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is this a buggy behavior? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2005111.1711293431@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is this a buggy behavior? (Thiemo Kellner <thiemo@gelassene-pferde.biz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is this a buggy behavior?
Re: Is this a buggy behavior? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Thiemo Kellner <thiemo@gelassene-pferde.biz> writes: > Am 24.03.2024 um 15:54 schrieb Erik Wienhold: >> This is required by the SQL standard: columns of a primary key must be >> NOT NULL. Postgres automatically adds the missing NOT NULL constraints >> when defining a primary key. You can verify that with \d test1 in psql. > To me, this behaviour, while correct, is not too concise. I wished, that > PG issued a warning about a definition conflict. In PostgreSQL, a PK > must always be not nullable, so explicitly defining on of a PK's columns > as nullable is contradictory, one should get notified of. To do that, we'd have to remember that you'd said NULL, which we don't: the word is just discarded as a noise clause. Considering that this usage of NULL isn't even permitted by the SQL standard, that seems like a bit too much work. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: