Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051104212522.GA9989@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Assert failure found in 8.1RC1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 06:45:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Creager <Robert.Creager@Sun.com> writes: > > Ran with both for an hour with no problem, where I could produce the ASSERT > > failure within minutes for the non patched version. > > Great. I'll go ahead and commit the smaller fix into HEAD and the back > branches, and hold the larger fix for 8.2. > > It's curious that two different people stumbled across this just > recently, when the bug has been there since 7.2. I suppose that the > addition of pg_subtrans increased the probability of seeing the bug by > a considerable amount, but I'm still surprised it wasn't identified > before. At the very least, we should have heard about it earlier in > the 8.0 release cycle ... Well, the common theme in each case IIRC is a fairly high transaction rate; on the order of hundreds if not thousands per second. Could something like that be added to regression, or maybe as a seperate test case for the buildfarm? -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: