Re: searching array
От | Matthew Peter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: searching array |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051017185450.70191.qmail@web35207.mail.mud.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: searching array (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: searching array
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Yes. I did read it wrong. I wanted to find all records that contained x where x >= 10000 I am using ANY in my query on my test box I copied the ALL from example query in the docs, which still isn't working for me. --- Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Matthew Peter <survivedsushi@yahoo.com> writes: > > Shouldn't >= also return Carols records since she > > contains records GREATER THAN 10000? > > You seem to be reading the construct backwards. > > x >= ALL (array) > > is true if x >= every member of the array. This is > clearly false > for x = 10000 and array = {20000, 25000, 25000, > 25000} ... in fact, > x isn't >= any of those members. > > regards, tom lane > __________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: