Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Really?  Do we intend applications to call it?
>
> > Uh, well, we never call it ourselves, so if we don't expect other
> > applications to call it, why is it there?
>
> If it's intended for apps to call, how was the patch initially accepted
> with no documentation?

Not sure.  That's why its history needs to be researched.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073