Re: Dumb question about serial's upper limit
От | Jim C. Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dumb question about serial's upper limit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051011061227.GJ23883@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Dumb question about serial's upper limit (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Dumb question about serial's upper limit
Re: Dumb question about serial's upper limit |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:59:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > CSN <cool_screen_name90001@yahoo.com> writes: > > If integer's range is -2147483648 to +2147483647, why > > is serial's range only 1 to 2147483647 instead of 1 to > > about 4294967294? > > How are you going to stuff 4294967294 into an integer field, which as > you just stated has an upper limit of 2147483647? > > If we had an unsigned int type, we could use it for serial and get > that result, but we do not. Out of curiosity... why don't we have unsigned ints? I for one would certainly use them for id fields, as well as some other places where I knew negative numbers weren't valid. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: