Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051009171946.GG24701@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function ("Tony Marston" <tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:05:41AM +0100, Tony Marston wrote: > > > "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes: > > > And you might want to make it a project at http://pgfoundry.org > > > so others can make use of it. You might also want to define it > > > as accepting an array; I think that would allow you to accept > > > any number of parameters. > > > > I think Tony is trying to avoid putting in any actual work ;-). > > To me, the sanest change would be to modify his app to use the > > SQL-standard syntax. Which surely is supported by those other > > databases too, no? And if not, why are *we* the ones getting the > > bug report? > > > > regards, tom lane > > You are getting this as a bug report for the simple reason that your > website does not seem to have a method of accepting enhancement > requests. That is why I specifically put ENHANCEMENT REQUEST in the > description. I've never seen somebody try so hard to get himself labeled as a help-rejecting complainer before. Are you *certain* that this is what you want to do, Tony? Cheers, D -- David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote!
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: