Re: Oracle buys Innobase
От | Martín Marqués |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200510081849.45507.martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle buys Innobase (felix@crowfix.com) |
Список | pgsql-general |
El Sáb 08 Oct 2005 18:11, felix@crowfix.com escribió: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:31:30AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote: > > > What it comes down to is this. MySQL is dual licensed. You can use > > the GPL version, or the commercial version. In order to sell the > > commercially licensed version, MySQL must have the rights to all the > > code in their base. So, in order for MySQL to sell a commercail > > version of MySQL with innodb support, they have to pay innobase a > > bit to include it, or rip it out. > > I don't understand. If both MySQL and Innodb are GPL licensed, > commercial or not should make no difference, and they can add all the > GPL changes they want o the last Innodb GPL release. > > What am I missing? They can't enforce a commercial licence over a GPL aplication. -- select 'mmarques' || '@' || 'unl.edu.ar' AS email; --------------------------------------------------------- Martín Marqués | Programador, DBA Centro de Telemática | Administrador Universidad Nacional del Litoral ---------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: