Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
От | CSN |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051008180424.16774.qmail@web52903.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> On 10/6/2005 4:37 AM, Tzvetan Tzankov wrote: > > > They have collation and multiple characterset per table and etc. which actually is from 4.1 (not new in 5.0), and postgresql have only one collation per database cluster :-( > > Otherwise I think their features are all there, but cannot be used togather most of them (you can have foreign key, but not using fulltext ...) > > > AFAIK MySQL's fulltext indexing is only supported on MyIsam tables, so if you want to use it, you lose ACID, hot backup and a couple other nice things entirely for that part of your data. Many MySQL users still believe that the pluggable storage engine design is an advantage ... I think one storage engine that supports the full feature set is better. > > Jan I agree - MySQL really has a confusing array of different database engines: # MyISAM # MERGE # ISAM # HEAP # InnoDB # BDB or BerkeleyDB Tables # Example # Archive # Federated # CSV # Blackhole # NDB Cluster http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/storage-engines.html CSN __________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. Try it free. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: